Scoring Scale
- Poor-Standards are not met and you would not recommend this for funding
- Satisfactory-The minimum standard you would recommend for funding
- Good-An appropriate level for a student at this level, though perhaps slightly below average
- Very Good-An appropriate level for a student at this level, though perhaps slightly above average
- Outstanding-Beyond expectation for a student of this level. Minimal flaws.
Please enter the number (1-5) for each scoring criterion you think is most appropriate below.
Consider these criterion when scoring each section:
Quality of Background and Methods (30%)
Concise, feasible, well justified
Quality of Communication (20%)
Clarity/Presentation of Proposal
Academic Impact (15%)
Could lead to future funding, Could change understanding in that field?
Community Impact (15%)
Project is collaborative, Results could improve quality of life for people with lived experience
Applicants (10%)
Applicants are qualified to do project? Project would be a new direction for applicants
Financially justified (10%)
Is the impact justified by requested funds?